Thursday, March 8, 2012

Rights of the Accused: RIGHT TO BAIL

1. Basco vs Rapatalo               A.M. No. RTJ-96-1335.  March 5, 1997
    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/mar1997/am_rtj_96_1335.htm
2. People vs Fortes                  
G.R. No. 90643 June 25, 1993


    
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1993/jun1993/gr_90643_1993.html
3. Commendador vs De Villa   
G.R. No. 93177 August 2, 1991


   
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1991/aug1991/gr_93177_1991.html
4. Manotoc vs CA                   
G.R. No. L-62100 May 30, 1986

    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1986/may1986/gr_62100_1986.html


Other cases not listed:

5. Dela Camara vs Enage         
G.R. Nos. L-32951-2 September 17, 1971


   
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1971/sep1971/gr_32951_2_1971.html
6. Enrile vs Salazar                   
G.R. No. 92163 June 5, 1990


   
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/jun1990/gr_92163_1990.html
7. Paderanga vs CA                  
G.R. No. 115407 August 28, 1995

   http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1995/aug1995/gr_115407_1995.html
8. People vs Donato                  
G.R. No. 79269 June 5, 1991


    
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1991/jun1991/gr_79269_1991.html
9. Govt of the US vs Purganan   G.R. No. 148571.  September 24, 2002
   http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2002/sep2002/148571.htm
10. Maguddatu vs CA              G.R. No. 139599. February 23, 2000
  http://www.chanrobles.com/scdecisions/jurisprudence2000/feb2000/139599.php
11. Tucay vs Domagas              
A.M. No. RTJ-95-1286 March 2, 1995


  
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1995/mar1995/am_rtj_95_1286_1995.html

Rights of the Accused: CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION

You may click on the following links for easier access of full-text cases.

1. Gamboa vs Cruz           
G.R. No. L-56291 June 27, 1988


    
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1988/jun1988/gr_l_56291_1988.html
2. People vs Macar          
G.R. Nos. L-91011-12 November 24, 1994


    
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/nov1994/gr_l_91011_12_1994.html
3. People vs Judge Ayson          
G.R. No. 85215 July 7, 1989


    
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/jul1989/gr_85215_1989.html
4. People vs Bolanos       

   http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1992/jul1992/gr_101808_1992.html 
5. People vs Andan        G.R. No. 116437.  March 3, 1997
   http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1997/mar1997/116437.htm
6. Navallo vs Sandiganbayan            
G.R. No. 97214 July 16, 1994

   http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/jul1994/gr_97214_1994.html
7. People vs Dy              
G.R. No. 74517 February 23, 1988


   
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1988/feb1988/gr_74517_1988.html
8. People vs Alicando     
G.R. No. 117487 December 12, 1995


    
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1995/dec1995/gr_117487_1995.html
9. RA 7438
   http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1992/ra_7438_1992.html

Rights of the Accused: RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION

Please click on the links below to access full text of cases easier.

1. US vs Tan Teng         G.R. No. 7081           September 7, 1912
    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1912/sep1912/gr_7081_1912.html
2. Beltran vs Samson      G.R. No. 32025        September 23, 1929
    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1929/sep1929/gr_32025_1929.html
3. Chavez vs CA               G.R. No. L-29169           August 19, 1968
    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1968/aug1968/gr_l-29169_1968.html
4. Pascual vs Board of Medical Examiners          G.R. No. L-25018               May 26, 1969
    http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1969/may1969/gr_l-25018_1969.html
5. Mapa Jr vs Sandiganbayan                   
G.R. No. 100295 April 26, 1994


     
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1994/apr1994/gr_100295_1994.html

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Rights of the Accused: CRIMINAL DUE PROCESS

Please click the link below for easier access to full text of cases

1. Tatad vs Sandiganbayan             
G.R. No. 72335-39
 
March 21, 1988
2. Galman vs Sandiganbayan           
G.R. No. 72670 September 12, 1986
3. Alonte vs Savellano G.R. No. 131652.  March 9, 1998

Rules of Court on Rights of the Accused



RULE 115 – RIGHTS OF ACCUSED

Section 1. Rights of accused at trial. – In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be entitled to the following rights:
(a) To be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved beyond reasonable doubt.
(b) To be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him.
(c) To be present and defend in person and by counsel at every stage of the proceedings, from arraignment to promulgation of the judgment. The accused may, however, waive his presence at the trial pursuant to the stipulations set forth in his bail, unless his presence is specifically ordered by the court for purposes of identification. The absence of the accused without justifiable cause at the trial of which he had notice shall be considered a waiver of his right to be present thereat. When an accused under custody escapes, he shall be deemed to have waived his right to be present on all subsequent trial dates until custody over him is regained. Upon motion, the accused may be allowed to defend himself in person when it sufficiently appears to the court that he can properly protect his rights without the assistance of counsel.
(d) To testify as a witness in his own behalf but subject to cross-examination on matters covered by direct examination. His silence shall not in any manner prejudice him.
(e) To be exempt from being compelled to be a witness against himself.
(f) To confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him at the trial. Either party may utilize as part of its evidence the testimony of a witness who is deceased, out of or cannot with due diligence be found in the Philippines, unavailable, or otherwise unable to testify, given in another case or proceeding, judicial or administrative, involving the same parties and subject matter, the adverse party having the opportunity to cross-examine him.
(g) To have compulsory process issued to secure the attendance of witnesses and production of other evidence in his behalf.
(h) To have speedy, impartial and public trial.
(i) To appeal in all cases allowed and in the manner prescribed by law.

Speedy Disposition of Cases

Please click the link below for your easier access of the cases.

1. Conde vs Rivera 45 Phil 650       G.R. No. L-21741             January 25, 1924
                http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1924/jan1924/gr_l-21741_1924.html
2. Padua vs Ericta 161 SCRA 458        
G.R. No. L-38570 May 24, 1988

               http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1988/may1988/gr_l_38570_1988.html
3. Guerrero vs CA G.R. No. 107211.  June 28, 1996
              http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1996/jun1996/107211.htm
4. Caballero vs Alfonso Jr 
G.R. No. L-45647 August 21, 1987

               http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1987/aug1987/gr_l_45647_1987.html

Writ of Habeas Corpus Cases

Please click the link below for your easy access of the cases. :-)


1. Castillo vs Amanda Cruz November 25, 2009
                   http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/nov2009/gr_182165_2009.html
2. Alvarez vs PICOP Resources December 3, 2009
                  http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_162243_2009.html
3. Neri vs Senate Committee on Accountability March 25, 2008
                 http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/sep2008/gr_180643_2008.html
4. Ramos vs Ramos January 25, 2008
                 http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2008/jan2008/CA-07-22-P.htm
5. People vs Umanito October 26, 2007
                 http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/apr2009/gr_172607_2009.html
6. Ople vs Torres July 23, 1998
                 http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1998/jul1998/127685.htm
7. Romualdez vs COMELEC April 30, 2008
                 http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/dec2008/gr_167011_2008.html